Croatia
Out of 184 recorded plenary votes during the 80th session period of the UN General Assembly (incl. emergency special sessions), Croatia participated in 184 (143 Yes, 20 No, 21 Abstain). In contested votes, its closest partner is Slovakia (95.8% – 68 of 71; in all votes 97.8% – 179 of 183).
Closest Partners at the UN
Countries with highest agreement in contested votes (where less than 90% voted in favor).
Furthest Countries at the UN
Countries with lowest agreement in contested votes.
Alignment with Key Powers and Partners
Agreement with selected powers across contested and all votes.
| Country | Contested agreement | All votes agreement | Opposite |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
90.1% (64 of 71) | 96.2% (176 of 183) | 0 |
|
|
88.7% (63 of 71) | 91.3% (168 of 184) | 1 |
|
|
88.7% (63 of 71) | 92.8% (167 of 180) | 2 |
|
|
85.9% (61 of 71) | 89.7% (165 of 184) | 2 |
|
|
43.7% (31 of 71) | 28.6% (40 of 140) | 59 |
|
|
41.4% (29 of 70) | 16.4% (30 of 183) | 125 |
|
|
31.0% (22 of 71) | 63.6% (117 of 184) | 34 |
|
|
29.6% (21 of 71) | 71.2% (131 of 184) | 23 |
Voting vs. European Union Majority
| Resolution | Croatia | EU Majority | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| A/RES/80/116 2025-12-12 | Abstain | Yes | Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Obligations of Isr… |
| A/RES/80/193 2025-12-15 | No | Abstain | A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism, racial discrimi… |
| A/RES/80/73 2025-12-02 | Abstain | Yes | The Syrian Golan : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly |
Against the Tide Votes (0×)
Votes where Croatia voted No while at least 90% of voting states voted Yes.
No such votes recorded in this session.
For data nerds: weighted agreement M2 and Cohen's κ
Weighted agreement (metric M2 per METHOD.md) weights each vote by how contested it was: w = 1 − |yes − no| / voting. Lopsided votes have weights near zero (e.g. 170:3 has weight ~0.03), while close votes carry high weight (e.g. 90:80 has weight ~0.94). Cohen's κ (kappa) additionally corrects for chance agreement given each country's marginal vote distributions.
| Country | Weighted M2 | Cohen's κ | Contested % | All votes % | Opposite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
97.9% | 0.94 | 95.8% | 97.8% | 1× |
|
|
95.7% | 0.94 | 94.3% | 97.8% | 0× |
|
|
94.7% | 0.92 | 93.0% | 97.3% | 0× |
|
|
94.7% | 0.92 | 93.0% | 97.3% | 0× |
|
|
95.6% | 0.93 | 93.0% | 97.3% | 0× |
|
|
94.3% | 0.91 | 91.5% | 96.7% | 0× |
|
|
92.9% | 0.90 | 90.1% | 96.2% | 0× |
|
|
91.2% | 0.78 | 88.7% | 91.3% | 1× |
|
|
92.9% | 0.82 | 88.7% | 92.8% | 2× |
|
|
89.1% | 0.74 | 85.9% | 89.7% | 2× |
|
|
52.8% | 0.08 | 43.7% | 28.6% | 59× |
|
|
49.0% | 0.03 | 41.4% | 16.4% | 125× |
|
|
34.0% | 0.10 | 31.0% | 63.6% | 34× |
|
|
28.3% | 0.05 | 29.6% | 71.2% | 23× |
|
|
23.1% | -0.11 | 21.1% | 68.1% | 21× |
|
|
27.7% | -0.03 | 20.8% | 79.8% | 9× |
|
|
23.0% | -0.09 | 20.6% | 70.0% | 27× |
|
|
20.5% | -0.11 | 20.6% | 65.7% | 32× |
|
|
20.2% | -0.06 | 17.0% | 70.3% | 21× |
|
|
19.9% | -0.12 | 16.4% | 64.4% | 25× |