Belarus
Out of 184 recorded plenary votes during the 80th session period of the UN General Assembly (incl. emergency special sessions), Belarus participated in 183 (154 Yes, 12 No, 17 Abstain). In contested votes, its closest partner is Turkmenistan (86.5% – 45 of 52; in all votes 93.1% – 121 of 130).
Closest Partners at the UN
Countries with highest agreement in contested votes (where less than 90% voted in favor).
Furthest Countries at the UN
Countries with lowest agreement in contested votes.
Alignment with Key Powers and Partners
Agreement with selected powers across contested and all votes.
| Country | Contested agreement | All votes agreement | Opposite |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
76.1% (54 of 71) | 82.5% (151 of 183) | 13 |
|
|
71.8% (51 of 71) | 85.2% (156 of 183) | 3 |
|
|
26.8% (19 of 71) | 64.5% (118 of 183) | 30 |
|
|
22.5% (16 of 71) | 64.2% (115 of 179) | 27 |
|
|
22.5% (16 of 71) | 62.3% (114 of 183) | 34 |
|
|
19.7% (14 of 71) | 65.9% (120 of 182) | 25 |
|
|
12.7% (9 of 71) | 13.7% (19 of 139) | 89 |
|
|
8.6% (6 of 70) | 4.9% (9 of 182) | 149 |
Agreement with the European Union Majority
Against the Tide Votes (3×)
Votes where Belarus voted No while at least 90% of voting states voted Yes.
| Resolution | Vote | UN Tally | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| A/RES/80/214 2025-12-18 | No | Yes: 167, No: 2, Abs: 11 | National human rights institutions : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly |
| A/RES/80/256 2026-04-24 | No | Yes: 136, No: 3, Abs: 11 | Organization of the 2026 high-level meeting on HIV/AIDS |
| A/RES/80/57 2025-12-01 | No | Yes: 164, No: 6, Abs: 7 | Lethal autonomous weapons systems : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly |
For data nerds: weighted agreement M2 and Cohen's κ
Weighted agreement (metric M2 per METHOD.md) weights each vote by how contested it was: w = 1 − |yes − no| / voting. Lopsided votes have weights near zero (e.g. 170:3 has weight ~0.03), while close votes carry high weight (e.g. 90:80 has weight ~0.94). Cohen's κ (kappa) additionally corrects for chance agreement given each country's marginal vote distributions.
| Country | Weighted M2 | Cohen's κ | Contested % | All votes % | Opposite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
86.3% | 0.29 | 86.5% | 93.1% | 1× |
|
|
85.3% | 0.00 | 86.0% | 93.4% | 3× |
|
|
81.9% | 0.45 | 83.1% | 90.0% | 4× |
|
|
80.6% | -0.02 | 80.9% | 89.3% | 3× |
|
|
82.8% | 0.60 | 80.3% | 87.1% | 3× |
|
|
77.1% | 0.40 | 80.0% | 89.6% | 3× |
|
|
77.3% | 0.52 | 76.1% | 82.5% | 13× |
|
|
71.7% | 0.41 | 71.8% | 85.2% | 3× |
|
|
24.0% | -0.00 | 26.8% | 64.5% | 30× |
|
|
23.6% | 0.01 | 22.5% | 64.2% | 27× |
|
|
21.9% | -0.04 | 22.5% | 62.3% | 34× |
|
|
21.7% | -0.02 | 19.7% | 65.9% | 25× |
|
|
17.5% | -0.04 | 12.9% | 63.0% | 24× |
|
|
9.6% | -0.07 | 12.7% | 13.7% | 89× |
|
|
16.9% | -0.04 | 11.4% | 62.4% | 28× |
|
|
15.2% | -0.02 | 9.9% | 59.0% | 32× |
|
|
16.0% | -0.04 | 8.6% | 61.5% | 28× |
|
|
6.3% | -0.06 | 8.6% | 4.9% | 149× |